By Sam Vaknin
Author of “Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited”
The role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in promoting growth and sustainable development has never been substantiated. There isn’t even an agreed definition of the beast. In most developing countries, other capital flows – such as remittances – are larger and more predictable than FDI and ODA (Official Development Assistance).
Several studies indicate that domestic investment projects have more beneficial trickle-down effects on local economies. Be that as it may, close to two-thirds of FDI is among rich countries and in the form of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). All said and done, FDI constitutes a mere 2% of global GDP.
FDI does not automatically translate to net foreign exchange inflows. To start with, many multinational and transnational “investors” borrow money locally at favorable interest rates and thus finance their projects. This constitutes unfair competition with local firms and crowds the domestic private sector out of the credit markets, displacing its investments in the process.
Additionally, foreign investors tend to target countries with high tariffs (“tariff jumping”), thus increasing pressure on domestic manufacturers, adversely affecting the country’s terms of trade (via capital-intensive imports), and depriving the state of much-needed revenues. As Bhagwati and Johnson noted in the 1950s, under certain conditions which are common in commodity-producing regions of the globe, this can actually lead to immiseration despite growing capital investments and exports.
Many transnational corporations are net consumers of savings, draining the local pool and leaving other entrepreneurs high and dry. Foreign banks tend to collude in this reallocation of financial wherewithal by exclusively catering to the needs of the less risky segments of the business scene (read: foreign investors).
Additionally, the more profitable the project, the smaller the net inflow of foreign funds. In some developing countries, profits repatriated by multinationals exceed total FDI. This untoward outcome is exacerbated by principal and interest repayments where investments are financed with debt and by the outflow of royalties, dividends, and fees. This is not to mention the sucking sound produced by quasi-legal and outright illegal practices such as transfer pricing and other mutations of creative accounting.
Moreover, most developing countries are no longer in need of foreign exchange. “Third and fourth world” countries control three quarters of the global pool of foreign exchange reserves. The “poor” (the South) now lend to the rich (the North) and are in the enviable position of net creditors. The West drains the bulk of the savings of the South and East, mostly in order to finance the insatiable consumption of its denizens and to prop up a variety of indigenous asset bubbles.
Still, as any first year student of orthodox economics would tell you, FDI is not about foreign exchange. FDI encourages the transfer of management skills, intellectual property, and technology. In the long run, these exchanges between foreign headquarters and domestic operations create jobs in the host countries and improve the quality of goods and services produced in the economy. Above all, they give a boost to the export sector.
All more or less true. Yet, the proponents of FDI get their causes and effects in a tangle. FDI does not foster growth and stability. It follows both. Foreign investors are attracted to success stories, they are drawn to countries already growing, politically stable, and with a sizable purchasing power.
Foreign investors of all stripes jump ship with the first sign of contagion, unrest, and declining fortunes. In this respect, FDI and portfolio investment are equally unreliable. Studies have demonstrated how multinationals hurry to repatriate earnings and repay inter-firm loans with the early harbingers of trouble. FDI is, therefore, partly pro-cyclical. Additionally, investments by multinationals at home and abroad are highly correlated. In other words: when the firm suffers in its domestic market, it tends to reduce, freeze, or altogether withdraw investments all over the world.
What about employment? Is FDI the panacea it is made out to be?
Far from it. Foreign-owned projects are capital-intensive and labor-efficient. They invest in machinery and intellectual property, not in wages. Skilled workers get paid well above the local norm, all others languish. Most multinationals employ subcontractors and these, to do their job, frequently haul entire workforces across continents. The natives rarely benefit and when they do find employment it is short-term and badly paid. M&A, which, as you may recall, constitute 60-70% of all FDI are notorious for inexorably generating job losses. At best, in the short to medium term, FDI may encourage employment in the non-tradable sector, but not in the tradable one.
FDI buttresses the government’s budgetary bottom line but developing countries invariably being governed by kleptocracies, most of the money tends to vanish in deep pockets, greased palms, and Swiss or Cypriot bank accounts. Such “contributions” to the hitherto impoverished economy tend to inflate asset bubbles (mainly in real estate) and prolong unsustainable and pernicious consumption booms followed by painful busts.
Alphabetical Bibliography: Contemporary View
Austria’s Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe:‘Supply-Based’or ‘Market Driven’? – W Altzinger – thInternational Atlantic Economic Conference, Vienna, 1999
Blessing Or Curse?: Domestic Plants’ Survival and Employment Prospects After Foreign Acquisition – S Girma, H Görg – 2001 – opus.zbw-kiel.de
Competition for Foreign Direct Investment: a study of competition among governments to attract FDI – CP Oman – 2000 – books.google.com
(The) Contribution of FDI to Poverty Alleviation – C Aaron – Report from the Foreign Investment Advisory Service – 1999 – ifc.org
Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment – M Habib, L Zurawicki – Journal of International Business Studies, 2002
Determinants Of, and the Relation Between, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth – EG Lim, International Monetary Fund – 2001 – papers.ssrn.com
Direct Investment in Economies in Transition – K Meyer – Cheltenham and Northampton (1998), 1998
(The) disappearing tax base: is foreign direct investment (FDI) eroding corporate income taxes? – R Gropp, K Kostial – papers.ssrn.com
Does Foreign Direct Investment Accelerate Economic Growth? – M Carkovic, R Levine – University of Minnesota, Working Paper, 2002
Does Foreign Direct Investment Crowd Out Domestic Entrepreneurship? – K De Backer, L Sleuwaegen – Review of Industrial Organization, 2003
Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? – BS Javorcik – American Economic Review, 2004
Does foreign direct investment promote economic growth? Evidence from East Asia and Latin America – K Zhang – Contemporary Economic Policy, 2001
The Economics of Foreign Direct Investment Incentives – M Blomstrom, A Kokko – 2003 – NBER
The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms Evidence from firm-level panel data – J Konings – The Economics of Transition, 2001
Effects of foreign direct investment on the performance of local labour markets–The case of Hungary – K Fazekas – RSA International Conference, Pisa, 2003
(The) Effects of Real Wages and Labor Productivity on Foreign Direct Investment – DO Cushman – Southern Economic Journal, 1987
Employment and Foreign Investment: Policy Options for Developing Countries – S Lall – International Labour Review, 1995
Export Performance and the Role of Foreign Direct Investment – N Pain, K Wakelin – The Manchester School, 1998
Exports, Foreign Direct Investment and Employment: The Case of China – X Fu, VN Balasubramanyam – The World Economy, 2005
Facts and Fallacies about Foreign Direct Investment – RC Feenstra – 1998 – econ.ucdavis.edu
FDI and the labour market: a review of the evidence and policy implications – N Driffield, K Taylor – Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2000
Foreign Direct Investment and Capital Flight – C Kant – 1996 – princeton.edu
Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Development – T Ozawa – Transnational Corporations, 1992 – unctad.org
Foreign Direct Investment and Employment: Home Country Experience in the United States and Sweden – M Blomstrom, G Fors, RE Lipsey – The Economic Journal, 1997
Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality: Further Evidence – C our FAQ, R Zone – World Development, 1995
Foreign Direct Investment and Poverty Reduction – M Klein, C Aaron, B Hadjimichael, World Bank – 2001 – oecd.org
Foreign Direct Investment as a Catalyst for Industrial Development – JR Markusen, A Venables – 1997 – NBER
Foreign Direct Investment as an Engine of Growth – VN Balasubramanyam, M Salisu, D Sapsford – Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 1999
Foreign Direct Investment, Employment Volatility and Cyclical Dumping – J Aizenman – 1994 – NBER
Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: Employment Effects in the EU – H Braconier, K Ekholm – 2001 – snee.org
Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe since 1990: An Econometric Study – M Lansbury, N Pain, K Smidkova – National Institute Economic Review, 1996
Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries: A Selective Survey – Luiz R. de Mello Jr. – NBER
Foreign Investment, Labor Immobility and the Quality of Employment – D Campbell – International Labour Review, 1994
Foreign direct investment-led growth: evidence from time series and panel data – L de Mello – Oxford Economic Papers, 1999
Home and Host Country Effects of FDI – RE Lipsey – 2002 – NBER
How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? – E Borensztein, J De Gregorio, JW Lee – Journal of International Economics, 1998
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows on Regional Labour Markets in Hungary – K Fazekas – SOCO Project Paper 77c, 2000
(The) Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Wages and Employment – L Zhao – Oxford Economic Papers, 1998
(The) limited Impact of Foreign Investment in the Americas – Kevin P. Gallagher and Andrés López – http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/WorkingGroup_FDI.htm
(The) link between tax rates and foreign direct investment – SP Cassou – Applied Economics, 1997
Location Choice and Employment Decisions: A Comparison of German and Swedish Multinationals – SO Becker, K Ekholm, R Jäckle, MA Muendler – Review of World Economics, 2005
Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? – H Gorg – The World Bank Research Observer, 2004
Multinational Corporations and Foreign Direct Investment – Stephen D. Cohen – Oxford University Press, 2007
Should Countries Promote Foreign Direct Investment? – GH Hanson – 2001 – r0.unctad.org
Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research – RA de Mooij, S Ederveen – International Tax and Public Finance, 2003
Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer: A Survey – K Saggi – The World Bank Research Observer, 2002
Troubled Banks, Impaired Foreign Direct Investment: The Role of Relative Access to Credit – MW Klein, J Peek, ES Rosengren – The American Economic Review, 2002
Vertical foreign direct investment, welfare, and employment – W Elberfeld, G Gotz, F Stahler – Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, 2005
Volatility, employment and the patterns of FDI in emerging markets – J Aizenman – 2002 – NBER
Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK? – S Girma, D Greenaway, K Wakelin – Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2001
Why Investment Matters: The Political Economy of International Investments – Singh, Kavaljit – FERN (UK and Belgium)
Interactions between domestic and foreign investment (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026156069290020X) – Guy V.G. Stevens – (doi:10.1016/0261-5606(92)90020-X – http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-5606(92)90020-X) – Journal of International Money and Finance (http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-international-money-and-finance/), Volume 11, Issue 1, February 1992, Pages 40-62 – Published by Elsevier (https://www.elsevier.com/)
Foreign direct investment, technology transfer and domestic employment effects (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022199680900288) – Tetsunori Koizumi and Kenneth J. Kopecky – (doi:10.1016/0022-1996(80)90028-8 – http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(80)90028-8) – Journal of International Economics (http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-international-economics/), Volume 10, Issue 1, February 1980, Pages 1-20– Published by Elsevier (https://www.elsevier.com/)
Foreign direct investment with unemployment and endogenous taxes and tariffs (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199687800235) – James A. Brander and Barbara J. Spencer – (doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(87)80023-5 – http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(87)80023-5) – Journal of International Economics (http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-international-economics/), Volume 22, Issues 3-4, May 1987, Pages 257-279 – Published by Elsevier (https://www.elsevier.com/)
The impact of foreign direct investment on export structure and employment generation (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305750X87900167) – Carlos E. Santiago – (doi:10.1016/0305-750X(87)90016-7 – http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(87)90016-7) – World Development (http://www.journals.elsevier.com/world-development/), Volume 15, Issue 3, March 1987, Pages 317-328 – Published by Elsevier (https://www.elsevier.com/)
Effects of foreign investment in the presence of unemployment (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022199681900192) – Satya P. Das – (doi:10.1016/0022-1996(81)90019-2 – http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(81)90019-2) – Journal of International Economics (http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-international-economics/), Volume 11, Issue 2, May 1981, Pages 249-257– Published by Elsevier (https://www.elsevier.com/)
Tariffs, foreign capital and immiserizing growth with urban unemployment and specific factors of production (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304387882900190) – M.Ali Khan – (doi:10.1016/0304-3878(82)90019-0 – http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(82)90019-0) – Journal of Development Economics (http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-development-economics/), Volume 10, Issue 2, April 1982, Pages 245-256– Published by Elsevier (https://www.elsevier.com/)
Sam Vaknin ( http://samvak.tripod.com ) is the author of Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain – How the West Lost the East, as well as many other books and ebooks about topics in psychology, relationships, philosophy, economics, international affairs, and award-winning short fiction.
He is the Editor-in-Chief of Global Politician and served as a columnist for Central Europe Review, PopMatters, eBookWeb , and Bellaonline, and as a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent. He was the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory and Suite101.
Visit Sam’s Web site at http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com
Filed under: World in Conflict and Transition | Tagged: transition, microeconomics, macroeconomics, business, government, privatization, private sector, public sector, capital, markets, stock exchange, shares, bonds, finance, banks, savings, credit, money, |